Cross-Culture Analysis on “Outsourced”

payable to Western Noveltys Outsourcing scheme, Todd Anderson is sent to India. Upon arrival, Todd has completely no motif of what territory he is stepping into. With the lack of aw arness of the Indian last, he inaugural falls victim to a taxi drivers trickery, has to literally hop on a train and although he is offered a rear on the can-packed train carriage by a boy, but in return he has to offer up his lap for the boy to tantalize on. On freshman sight, Todd experienced a culture shock from the bargon culture of India (Sathe, 1985) that attacked his own core and starts to form judgments about this attendingly repelling and primitive country.The initial cont performance with a new culture gives come on to cultural differences and Todd finds himself struggling with them. This is the result of the differences in cultural p loops. The first attribute contrasting India and Todd, would be Collectivism versus Individualism. Individualism refers to how much a soulfulness is s elf-centered and free from control Collectivism refers to how the overall groups interest is placed above an individual. (Hofstede, 1980) Using win from the world project, India progress tos a high school 5. 92, much higher than the USAs score of 4. 5 on the collectivisticic scale where higher refers to more collectivistic. (House et al. 2004) Todd, originating from the US, is characterized as an employee who only has to worry about himself, does non involve himself with new(prenominal) employees. In the first scene, employees from the US have a very big secluded seat to themselves and the boss Dave has an veritable(a) more private enclosure. The function space reflects the culture of individualism from the US. However, in India, we gather up that employees interact with each other more frequently, such as Asha aiding out with employees and smaller desks for encompassing(prenominal) workings conditions.Even the supervisors desk lacked privacy due to the abstracted glass, which Todd nonpluss a big fuss about and showed closeness amongst the employer and employees. It is plain that the employees in India have a more collectivistic collective culture and this affected Todds individualistic valuates and beliefs. However, later in the flick, Todds individualistic personality slowly evolves into a collectivistic one as he immerses himself into Indias culture and diversityd his attractionship style.This showed during the incident when there was flooding, Todd and the rung members worked to calculateher as a team and Todd up to now asked his neighbour to help with the antecedent connections to benefit the groups goal. What Todd went with during his immersion in Indias culture is called Primary Socialization (Berger & Luckman, 1967) where he learned Indias culture by dint of living with Puros Aunt and socializing with the locals. Without the change in Todd from an individualist to a collectivist, the business could not have been as motiva ted or productive or carry outd its goal. ply outperform is the effect to which power is unequally distributed in a collective. A higher power distance score reflects high unequal distribution of power. From the GLOBE loads India has a higher power distance than the US (India = 5. 47 US = 4. 88) (House et al. 2004). In the movie, the Indian employees show a high power distance because they treat their superiors with respect. This could be seen in the actions of Puro. When he was reprimanded for the first time, he did not end up in an extreme debate with Todd regarding the high aim of the MPI.On the insurgent incident, when he was scolded, he was very apologetic and was heedful to bring clean food for Todd. This showed Puros deep reverence for the petabiter of the office. Another example was how the employees did not ask about better working conditions and accepted whatever Todd had dictated on them from the start until much later. However, when compared with the course Tod d talks to Dave, the barrier between him and the superior is thin. Todd can express his thoughts and freely rebut Dave with his own opinions such as calling Dave embodied slimeball, present over the MPI or the freight of company products.The language used through the communication between Dave and Todd sounds too casual to represent a high power distance. The impact power distance had on Todd was great because he had to change his casual methods, as seen during the accent classes, to exerting his leadership on the employees. However, the Power Distance between Todd and Dave did not change. The humane predilection of India ranks much higer than the US according to GLOBE project (India = 4. 57 US = 4. 17) (House et al. 004) The business in India does show a more humane style of working such as Asha caring for the employees, Puro caring Todd by winning him into his family circle and even caring for his well-being such as bringing him clean food. This dimension to a fault affected th e business when Todd finally changes his style of leadership. His humane orientation changes from a negative, sulky manager who lashes out at each fortune he can to a more encouraging manager who becomes a positive influence to the employees.However, throughout the film we see that Dave does not seem to care about the employees in India or even those who were outsourced right from the start. The rakish words he used when he essentialed to fire his US employees tell us that he was more interested in in the altogether the be of employment and his position as boss rather that the futures of the employees. This impact the business in India later when he continued to cut costs further by bringing the business to China. Additionally, Dave keeps bossing and pushing Todd around, first direct him to India, giving him a gravely time over his contract and even tried to send him to China.We have already established that India tends towards a collectivist culture and the US an individua list culture. Hence, diverse dimensions will require disparate motivational and leadership patterns. An individualist culture has both the employee and employer severe to make communal decisions that will benefit both bities, while in the collectivist culture, the reliance on the leader to have the whole group manifold is much greater. (Thomas, 2003) The cultural dimensions of India affects the way things are done in the corporate Indian office and Todd has to see them.Earley (1993) as well proved a race that collectivist cultures would show more work motivation and productiveness. Using vrooms Motivational theory, there lies a central theme of foreboding Theory. From there we can identify different motivational factors in the film. anticipation theory is based on of deciding how much effort should be tack together into a job for an outcome. The process of Expectancy Theory has 3 components campaign, Performance and Outcome. Among these 3 components, there are 2 expecta ncies.First is the Effort to Performance expectancy that is the belief whether making effort will lead to an expected success. The second is the Performance to Output expectancy that is how much value of the reward of the outcome. (Vroom, 1964) What the expectancies mean is that if a person believes that a certain exploit will lead to a desired outcome, they will then foreplay effort that will produce the required work to achieve the outcome. In the middle of the film, this theory can be applied when Todd decided to predate an motivator programme for employees.The programme allowed employee discounts for western novelty products. Additionally, as part of the motivational process, he gave an edict that whoever improves the Minutes Per Incident (MPI) for the day would get their pick on merchandises from their best sellers of their products. This is the work of Expectancy theory taking place with the new incentive programme, the employees clearly know what performance will lead t o a desired outcome, hence they will instinctively put in effort to achieve the performance required.Whereas for Todd, his outcome is to leave India and the performance is to bring the MPI to 6. 0. Hence his effort component will require him to comply with the collectivist culture of the Indian arm to achieve the outcome. Thus we see that their performance component to achieve a 6. 0 MPI is the same, their effort and outcomes are different because of differing roles, and individual goals. These differing roles and goals can be attributed to the differing individual motivatings. We can in addition apply Herzbergs Motivation-Hygiene Theory to the film.His theory suggests that satisfaction and dissatisfaction are deuce separate dimensions instead of two extremes of one dimension. (Herzberg , 1968) His hygiene factors refer to outside(a) factors such as factors outside an employees job that influences him. These are dissatisfiers conditions if they are present, the worker is neutr al but if absent, the worker will be dissatisfied. In the film, after the Day of Holy, Todd acknowledges his mistake of trying to run the Indian branch as an American office and asks how he could change the way the office is run.Suggestions include bringing family pictures to work, allowing them to bring what they want to the office as enormous as it doesnt get in the way of work, and wear whatever they want to work including ethnic clothing. We can tell from the employees faces that without proper working conditions, they were dissatisfiers to their productivity and after Todd had acknowledged change, it put a smile to their faces. For Todds position, when he first arrived in India, the working conditions were a total dissatisfier because the working conditions were different from his usual ones, especially because the place was in a rural lace and even animals were in the office. The culture shock resulted in him becoming tricky in the workplace such as scolding Puro a few times . However, later on in the film, other hygiene factors such as the build up in relationships between the characters helped overpowered his original hygiene factors. The second factor from Herzberg is the Motivation factor that is intrinsic in nature. These include arouse work, responsibility or career advancement. If they are present, the worker will be satisfied, but if absent the worker remains neutral.Asha did not want to signalise up for the incentive programme, and from her other actions and words, we can assume that her motivational factor was the work itself, or a career advancement when she took the initiative to act as supervisor on the Day of Holy and acting as a supervisor when they setup the office on the roof. Todd also promoted her to be the future assistant call manager. For Todd, it was after the Day of Holy where he became motivated to take on the challenge and responsibility of the business. We can also use McClellands Learned Needs Theory, to spot other motivat ional differences between the characters.The Learned Need Theory states that there is third major(ip) gets that influences peoples behaviour need for achievement, power and affiliation. (McClelland, 1966, 1985) The need for achievement relates to individuals who want success or failure. This can be identify with Dave whos only concern was himself, maximize the companys sugar by outsourcing the lowest cost possible services and neglecting the benefits of others. This need for achievement can also be identified in Todd when he first arrives and is only concerned about himself and forcing the MPI down to 6. 0.However, he then agnize that to achieve this, he has to had establish a reputable presence in the company which is the second need in the Learned Need Theory. The need for power relates to achieving reputation, and control over others. We might only see this through Todd in the later part of the movie whom starts to understand his position in India and makes the best of it by being the best manager possible and trying to win over the employees. But this was still done so that he can leave India when the MPI reaches 6. 0. So Todd achieves this by gaining respect from his subordinates by introducing an incentive programme.Todd knows that by introducing the programme, it will motivate him further. The need for affiliation relates to establishing relationships with others. This is seen in Asha who helps employees every now and then in the film. Ashas needs are also different from other employees, as she does not want any of the incentives outlined by Todd. Rather she establishes relationships between herself, the employees, Puro and Todd. This need is also manifested in these triplet characters because of the collectivistic corporate nature of the Indian branch.The relationship between the three characters deepens throughout the movie because they realized they were in the same boat and they had to achieve a common goal together, which becomes a shared ne ed. To sum up, the film showed us how our protagonist, Todd, developed his cultural intelligence (CQ). The distinct cultural differences between India and US, the contract between Todd and Dave left the protagonist with the uncontested choice to anticipate put and that had in effect, supported his growth of cultural intelligence.Todd had went through the stages of CQ development Reaction, Recognition, Accommodation, Assimilation and Proactivity (Thomas 2003) Not only did he learn about and alter to the new culture, he had also learned that he had to alter his corporate processes to make the business work. At the end, when Dave recommended Todd to move to China, he declined probably because Todd knew how hard it was to change and adapt to a new culture. References Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. crude York Doubleday. Earley, P. C. 1983) East meets West meets Mideast Further Explorations of Collectivistic and Individualistic ply Groups, ac ademy of Management Journal, 36 (2), 319-48 Herzberg, F. (1968) One more Time How Do You instigate Employees Harvard Business review, Jan-Feb Edition, 53-62 Hofstede, G. (1980) Cultures Consequences International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA Sage. House, R. J. , Hanges, P. J. , Javidan, M. , Dorfman, P. W. , and Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications London. Javidan, M. , Dorfman, P.W. , de Luque, M. S. , and House, R. J. (2006) In the eye of the beholder cross-cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1) 67-90. McClelland, D. C. (1966) That Urge to come upon THINK Magazine. McClelland, D. C. (1985) Human Motivation, Glen vview, IL Scott, Foresman. Sathe,V. (1985) Culture and Related Corporate Realities. Homewood, IL Irwin. Thomas D. C. , Inkson K. (2003) Cultural Intelligence People skills for Global Business, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Vr oom, V. H. (1964) Work and Motivation, New York Wiley. 331p.